In a Code Enforcement context, what type of evidence must be presented to substantiate a case?

Competent substantial evidence is crucial in a Code Enforcement context as it serves to substantiate claims or violations. This type of evidence is defined as reliable, credible, and relevant information that supports the enforcement action being taken. It is necessary for building a case that holds up under scrutiny, especially in legal or administrative proceedings.

For instance, competent substantial evidence may include documented observations, photographs, official reports, and testimony from witnesses that directly relate to the alleged violation. This type of evidence helps establish the facts of a case clearly and convincingly, enabling enforcement officers to demonstrate compliance or non-compliance with relevant codes and regulations.

In contrast, personal opinion lacks the objective basis needed to substantiate a violation, while community feedback, although informative, does not typically hold the same weight as documented evidence in a formal enforcement scenario. Expert testimony can be valuable, but it often serves as a supporting element rather than being the foundational evidence itself. Therefore, competent substantial evidence is fundamental in ensuring that code enforcement actions are justifiable and effective.