What is required for evidence to be considered relevant in a Code Case?

For evidence to be considered relevant in a code case, it is essential that it is pertinent to the facts of the case. Relevance means that the evidence has a logical connection to the issues being examined and can help to establish or undermine a fact that is significant to the case. In code enforcement, this might involve showing that a property does or does not comply with certain codes, regulations, or ordinances. Relevant evidence assists the decision-makers in understanding the circumstances, resolving disputes, and reaching informed conclusions about the matters at hand.

The other elements mentioned, such as needing multiple witnesses, being presented in a formal setting, or complying with federal laws, do not inherently define the relevance of evidence but rather relate to the context in which evidence might be used or the admissibility of that evidence in proceedings. Thus, while they can play roles in legal proceedings, they do not capture the primary criterion of relevance needed for a code case.