What must a Code Inspector provide to an alleged violator before issuing a formal notice of violation?

A Code Inspector must provide a notification and a timeline for correction to an alleged violator before issuing a formal notice of violation. This practice is rooted in the principles of due process and fairness, ensuring that individuals are informed of potential issues with compliance and given a reasonable opportunity to correct them.

By providing a clear notification, the inspector outlines the specific violations and the consequences of not addressing them, which enables the violator to understand what actions they need to take. The inclusion of a timeline for correction further establishes a framework for accountability and allows violators to plan their corrective measures accordingly. This approach fosters cooperation and can often lead to resolution without the need for more formal enforcement actions.

Additionally, the other choices do not align with best practices in code enforcement. A verbal warning may not provide adequate documentation of the violation or the opportunity to correct it, while a formal complaint document is typically issued after a violation is confirmed rather than as an initial step. A written apology is unrelated to the correction process and does not address the obligations of the alleged violator in resolving the identified issue.