What was ruled in Moore v. East Cleveland regarding the definition of "single family"?

In the case of Moore v. East Cleveland, the Supreme Court ruled that zoning laws defining "single family" could not prevent close relatives from living together in a single dwelling. The court found that the ordinance at issue unconstitutionally restricted the familial rights of individuals, particularly in neighborhoods where arrangements like these are common. The importance of this ruling lies in the recognition that familial relationships extend beyond just the nuclear family, permitting broader definitions that can include related individuals living together. This decision highlights the balance between local government zoning powers and the fundamental rights of family members to cohabitate, reinforcing the idea that close relatives should not be separated by overly restrictive definitions in the context of housing.